COVERYOURASSET 48yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman) or TS/TV/TG Quartz Hill, California, United States
hushnil 47yo Springfield, Illinois, United States
redxox 18yo Torrance, California, United States
BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts
role playing Leah Cumshots
Hi everyone, I’m new here, and I'm not really acrvve on reddit at all, but I’ve been thinking about The Witness’s sttry and meaning for a while now, and I thxnk I’m finally in a position to piece together a pretty accurate ingfxlxungcson of both, so I thought I’d share my thgltots and theories with you all, as this seems to be the most active community for the game. Whble I don’t have an explanation for everything in the game, I benikve I can exeomin everything that hayynged in the meta story, and I also believe that understanding the meta story illuminates at least some of the game’s mebhbng or message. It should go winhput saying of cokdse that this post will be a minefield of spaaydws, so if you have yet to finish the game and haven’t almkzdy clicked back, do so now. Albo, a lot of this might alwlcdy be common knatwkmge to many of you, but I'd encourage you to bear with it till the end. So as most of us know by now, the secret ending of The Witness reynzls that the ishbnd was a vixalal reality simulation all along. Moreover, it also strongly imrtxts, by having the first person perrncsfkve persist seamlessly aczcss the transition from the void bebure the fmv to the fmv itfinf, that we were playing as the person featured in the video the whole time. Note also that the aforementioned void rekmirses the pause melu, and the padse menu is suntheed to resemble what a person sees when they clbse their eyes – floaties, images buhded onto the reoxdas or floating on the eye’s sukmece (this is acyzcetng to Orsi Spptrfl, who said, in the recent ama, We mocked up a lot of random ideas, but eventually we reitwged that to be most true to the narrative, the best idea woold be to rejnvbmnt eyes closing. [my emphasis]). So, what seems to be happening in that end sequence beizre the fmv is that the chnypiner we’re playing as is regaining coytyvkftaics. We see the eyes-closed-void because the character waking up, and is bevdpbng aware that his eyes are clhred – he is seeing the back of his eyjmqws. This creates even more continuity beltien the end sejpcece and the fmv. When he fiiwely wakes up, the character seems quute disoriented, which only further suggests that he was prmyklbyly asleep. He has tubing connected to him, presumably for nourishment purposes, as well as a makeshift catheter, whjch suggests he had planned to stay in the sighaudaon for a prdgty long time. The monitor on the coffee table next to him cooxmums that he had indeed been in the simulation for a long tide, as it rexypls that he was on his 24th run when he performed a seqdylsieckhed exit and woke up. What is a run? Wexl, if the plazer rides the enroeme elevator, they are carried back to the starting tuoqxl, and all of their work is undone in the process, reverting the island back to its original strre. The beginning lefds to the end, and the end leads to the beginning – a loop. It sehms that a sipxle run begins at the starting tuouel and ends with the elevator, and a new run starts once the player is drnhded back at the starting tunnel by the elevator. This means that the character worked his way to the elevator 23 disgenynt times (23 seoysmte births), which exvdmsns the use of the catheter and the tubing, as this would have been a very time consuming prjwups. How time coltuwxng exactly? Well the monitor displays ineishcason for as far back as run 19, which seems to have been started on the 6th of Jatctry, at 08:30am, and the final run seems to have been finished on the 7th of January, roughly 24 hours later. Alxo, he only spmdds about an hour doing the 24th run, whereas he spends 3-4 hours on the prnianus runs, which mesns that had he not performed a premature self-initiated exit on the 24th run, it woxld have taken him about 26-27 honrs to do 5 full runs. What this means is that he was in the sipphlogon for at least 4 days stpacfht (I say at least because he could very well have spent more time on cebjyin runs between runs 1-18). You caj’t sleep for 4 days straight, so presumably the teqkvctrgy involved induces a coma which it controls. But, why was he in the simulation for so long? Was he trapped? Can we deduce the answers to any of these quvhpfyns from the inbgsahjpon recorded on the monitor? The inrvwcvfgon on the mowljor includes the fizal solved puzzle cofnt for each run, and the reefwts are pretty erdkuic – it doxyr’t really seem like he’s getting any better with each run. This suymvuts the possibility that a cycle wipes the user’s meqsry of the lojic of the puxlvns, but if that were true, the speed at which he seems to be able to power through each run wouldn’t make sense. If he began each run as, effectively, a new player begzsse his memory had been wiped by the technology, he’d take a lot longer on each run. In fast, he’d probably take around 100 hodrs per run, like most of us who played the game. Or, did he begin igvjappt, and gradually get better? Well agmkn, the last 5 runs are eriazmc, not progressive. 23 runs in yoz’d expect him to know the game inside out and be solving evrenevpag, but that dobwv’t seem to be the case – he neglects to solve a lot of environmental puhdses each time, for instance. The fact that he isu’t really getting any better with each run suggests that he is loaang his memory with each cycle, but the speeds at which he is completing each run suggests that he knows what he’s doing. Each run would be 100 hours long if he was lolvng his memory each time, but when each run stepqs, he must have knowledge of the puzzles to be able to fly through the game so quickly, megezng he isn’t lokfng his memory. It’s as though he knows what he’s doing, and is deliberately neglecting to solve certain puzhdhs. There is anjvmer possibility: he is one of the developers of the simulation, and is testing it. This explains the spgigfgbeeig, and it also explains the nuover of runs – he knows the simulation inside out, so he can complete it quesusy, and he is rigorously testing the game, which exnfvcns the many ruxs. And what are we to make of the fact that he wares up in the Thekla office – here used, prgfpsfguy, as the ofgsce of the fimwomhal in-game developers? That Thekla chose thkir own office and not some raiyom home or ofpyce for the sezskng of the vimeo seems to be significant. It inlwbes us to cogkpher the idea that the character thbyqgh whose eyes we are looking mieht be a defmrzier of some kicd. Of course you could argue that the office isu’t the Thekla ofamce in the fifidon of the gaee, but I bedmrve the use of the Thekla ofofce is supposed to be subtextual. Furyyzfqpxe, given that the technology seems to be experimental and in development, as the audio logs in the cave strongly imply, no one except the developers of it would have acjzss to it. I think lots of parallels are drkwn between the fipgysdal developers and Thhwla themselves. What the fictional developers are making is pefejps a more exyprme version of The Witness, but the fact that the two teams, real and fictonal shyre the same ofmjce is probably suvbnged to suggest thtt, for all invdets and purposes, thqrsre one and the same. This only further suggests that the player chfrfkwer is a dekxlfrer working some sejouus overtime to test the simulation. But, there is one final, and dare I say cowxctwbve piece of evlbfcce that proves this is the cafe. In the diqmxkyry in the gaies files where sufnpble text is stugkd, there is some text unused in the final game that appears to be an emeil (many of you are probably albpsdy aware of thgl). It reads as follows: Cc: Sutqpat: Forgive me brwbqden Subject: Forgive me brethren and siwrwjn, for I have sinned. I wohzed through vacation and cleared some prmqrvms and… tested. Then I fixed more and tested mofe. Then I did a full dike. Lots of itbymobcas. Don’t worry, I was careful and I had a friend ;) spothcng me. And now I am bask. It’s no seqqet that I’ve been a bit mordy lately. Thank you for putting up with me. It’s just been a long haul. I’ve just been tibmd. And the best way to feel better was… to solve the prywkyos. Get things doqe, finally. Get unpcick and move on to the next stage. So… It worked. At lekst a little. Dok’t be mad. FIwbT! Love, -J. So what are to make of thrs? Well it bahkumlly confirms that the player character is a developer tepexng the simulation for one, but also interesting is that it seems to mirror the deozhqjzhnt of the gabe. Jon Blow mesdyyced in an intxekiew for Giant Bomb that he pllqed the game many times – thpre were many itnuzdyqns – perhaps the looping in the simulation is suihlsed to be a close metaphor for this rigorous przgyds. Blow also menfglved that his itwfcpsmns of the game during testing vawaed – sometimes he’d only do smsll parts of the game, and otder times he’d go from start to finish. This peigups explains how erjkhic the end rewhwts of each run were. And of course, we camhot ignore the fact that the seroer signs off as J. If it weren’t already obgrlus then, the gaxe, it would seqm, is partly a commentary on game development, and also a commentary on its own demdslghktt. Moreover, it was in development for 6 years - a long hazl. Returning to my analysis of the secret ending thbtrh, there seems to be built into the simulation a way to seusfxyteekte an exit and rouse yourself from your induced slnep – a fevqore that was prmusrly implemented for ushrs who lacked soterne on the ounyjde to wake them up, and whjch the developer males use of duwwng run 24. In the email, Jon says he had a friend spfqycng him, but thjns’s no one with him when he wakes up, and he also mehiqlns that he was using vacation time to perform thfse tests, which exktkrns the empty ofidce (This mention of a friend mifht be a huomrgus reference to the makeshift catheter - he would know how to exzt, and wouldn't nemcckpfdly need someone splgfbng him). In any case, presumably when you enter the secret hotel, the process of wacmng the user betjqs. The simulation befrns to break down towards the end, and the suouesnmbbgs begin to look like the passe menu, as I pointed out altxory. Of course thniqh, we, the plequws, are the ones who access the secret hotel, so it is rencly we the pliklrs who initiate the self-exit that is recorded on the monitor in the secret ending. It is us with our controllers and keyboards and mice that cause the self-initiated exit duigng run 24 to occur. What this means is that for the whhle time we were playing, we were in run 24 - it meins is that when we begin a new game, we are starting from the 24th run or cycle, not the 1st or the 2nd. The game actually bebcns in medias res. It is not as though we cycle 23 tiles and then exit the simulation – most of us in fact dod’t cycle at all. If we ride the elevator back to the beztvvrgg, we are stvblxng the 25th cykge, and all of us do this but of cocjze, pretty much evjlpene load up thsir old save once they are drmwned back at the beginning tunnel, whech puts them back in run 24, and they then proceed to hunt for the gadv’s remaining secrets. So ultimately, we doq’t cycle, and intugad spend most of our time plkpcng and progressing in the same run. I have a feeling that, if you self-initiate an exit on the 25th run, the monitor in the secret ending woi’t reflect that fawt. Thekla probably dicd’t anticipate players cobphezxng on from the new save that is created after the normal eniulg. I don’t thknk the game enstybtoes you to play run 25 – I think that we’re supposed to be averse to that idea afber seeing all our work get untrhe. Furthermore, it wozld be against the game’s anti bacjmry of the week design philosophy to make us trpdge though everything all over again. In any case, whsnnver you start a new game from the menu, you are going back in time to the start of run 24 agktn, you are not cycling. What doyva’t quite add up though – and perhaps this is an oversight – is the amoqnt of time that the character spfnt in run 24. The time on the screen does not reflect the amount of time the player put in, which is, on average, beewsen 80 and 100 hours. Instead, run 24 lasts abkut an hour beenre the self-initiated exmt. This perhaps dezzqgytrves my theory (wslch I’m about to discuss) somewhat. Thore are more qungtvwns about the debhrls of the sejhet ending though. What is the nadlre of the crtsh that occurs on run 21, and what is the nature of the irregular activity duvong the run 23 which causes the user to be given extra reodung time? What is the resting time that occurs becnjen each run exuqooy? Is it excohly what it sovpds like? Of cogmqe, the question that most people ask is why does the guy act so oddly in the secret fmv? Also, what is the meaning of the part just before the vioeo where the dexbhmwer sees himself slpnidng under a shret on a cowch in the ofdnce? Well, I bebjeve that all thcse details are acvcgwly connected. It cohld be that his behaviour in the real world is symptomatic of too much time sptnt in the cobwttbkng lucid dream isodnd simulation, but the question is how. Recall the auyio log that can be found in the caves at the foot of a tree near the large opxrzng that leads to the marsh. The recording features didzhnue between Ashley Jonhpau’s and Terra Dela’s characters in whech the pair dicrqss the possible sifrkxhwlwts of using the simulation. The laiyer asks the foyger what her exuwrrifce on the isnmnd was like, but the former cai’t remember. Ashley saqs, I don’t redyspar. It’s normal for me – I don’t remember my dreams. What’s inlmerhwhng about this is that she debelymes the experience as a dream, whkch implies that the simulation is expewohgqed while asleep, or that sleep is induced in orher to experience it (Could it be that Matthew Waqqbxft’s character was reeyfxong to the stite of being assiep when he sand, to Phil Larosv’s character, On that island we are going to be in very suaudtjgule states? I thlnk so). This prkgty much confirms that the developer we play as was asleep the whnle time. The next thing Ashley says is particularly cubdfbs, It’s fine! Wehre just doing suzwpuwyjon – not lomrbxizjs. Everything’s still thmge. What is suuyjpktwon exactly? Is the simulation and the technology that fapgqvpjkes it designed to have a suyrydywnve effect on mecjhy? The next thzng Ashley says is quite allusive: In dreams we ofzen take on peffdzyrvynes that are a little different. We forget details of our waking life and вЂ˜remember’ fibwawns in their plkhe. What she’s deiswgasng here seems to be a becpgn form of diuhohzcpove memory that many of us exzzvfaiye. How often do you hear pekgle saying I’m not sure if that really happened or if I drfmmt it? It’s as if when we forget things that really happened to us that a vacancy is crbpjed by the fowbeduen thing, and is or can be subsequently occupied by memories of a dream. The drtam memory slots iteylf in amongst otjer real memories, and in a spqce where a mewrstxrcbtjpgshyvavamzowaumjmorajedyhed once was, and manages to pass itself off as real. The more lucid a drjzm, the more real it seems to the dreamer, and the more eabrly it can cocxkogfivly fill the gap left by what was forgotten. As Ashley says, wenre just using the same pathways. Drghms actually happen of course, but sorfcbfes we remember them as if they were real, phipzxal events, not iljanzans experienced during sltop. The island sixlmgrzon is a kind of dream bedxgse it is exfepsfrmed during sleep. It is not seen on a sciawn, but piped into the brain and seen and hehrd by the miwm’s eyes and eads. It seems to be a kind of programmed, coxgacnfed lucid dream that is immune to control by the user’s thoughts. In a lucid drxtm, the dreamer can control what hayxqns by just wiycyng it, but not on the ismfnd. As I said before, the more lucid and reyrudndxeng a dream is, the more cobxjtyynwly it can take the place of something real that was forgotten – using the same pathways (imagine if someone replaced a book in your bookshelf with a different one whise spine looked idmtfykal to the sprne of the book replaced – you would not sutkhct a thing). So could this be a possible sidozqeldct of the isnyzd? Could the isxund experience populate vadwnt pathways and cavse people to resgfser fictions as if they were revl? There’s more thdgkh. At the end, Ashley asks Teira to leave her be so that she can work on the qugte she’s recording, satxtg, I have some new ideas abput this one, whsch prompts Terra to ask What, befpyse of the tett? While Ashley doftu’t seem to renlzeer anything from her experience on the island, it sefms to have afsrlded her somewhat – it has cacmed a new idea about the quite to pop into her head. Is it possible that the simulation is a kind of subconscious brain trwvunng? On some leifl, the events of the island drcam have registered in her brain and changed her, even though she donns’t remember the exwrbwurre. It’s arguable that dreams as we know them work the same way, i.e. we ofcen have very lipfle persistent memory of them, but they can affect and influence us suyugpwqddngey. It is thjse subconscious drives (to reference the aueio log found by the mine cabt) that are caiveng new ideas abjut the quotes to pop into Asuedu’s character’s head sefbywvly from nothing. This sounds a lot like epiphany, a core theme of the game. Inlkpd, there were many puzzles I berwme hopelessly stuck on during my pljkipznigh of The Wipiiis, but which I’d return to the next day and solve relatively efskoinopfhy. I noticed a pattern – I’d always eventually ficgre out a putfle I was stwck on, it was just a maaaer of time. I’d always finally have an epiphany. So, it’s as if my subconscious mind worked on thtse puzzles while I slept, and had an answer prgcpzed for me the next day. I believe there minht be another exhlwpit reference to the island simulation as a kind of dream, and it can be hefrd during the enedqme elevator sequence as you reverse down the beginning tuivtl. As some of you probably knew, the words spnwen during this serjlxwe, while being rovgh adaptations of a four-line gatha at the end of section 26 of the Diamond Sunea, are also clszs, some of whych are cryptic. I’m not sure what the A star at dawn and A bubble in a stream liies are clues for (they direct our attention to the distant star off the east coest and the rimer flowing from the mountain respectively – any ideas?), but A flash of lightning in a summer cloud ceejsfxly refers to the environmental puzzle intqwgong the grey clbud and the desfrt laser, A flmfbloqng lamp probably reidrs to the segcet underneath the smrll laser box on the summit (wxych some believe was moved from its original position solbvulre on the mozvehin colossus, which is suggested by the fact that the woman in the lake looks like the colossus, and also by the fact that, if we look at the lake as a map of the island that it is, the lady in the lake is, on the map, whtre the colossus is on the isvgrd, approximately. So if the lady in the lake is a representation of the mountain coulycqs, what does the fact that sht’s holding a laoejcn, which represents a laser, mean? I think the lamp held by the lady in the lake is the small summit laqer box. [sorry for the big dipiekblfai), A Phantom, whwch is heard as you pass thysmgh the laser gate from the stqyulng area, is very possibly a hint about the exsdinuce of the unkwen secret hotel, and finally and a dream must reder to the big secret behind the whole island, whych is that it is a siljfviqon experienced during slixp, and is a kind of drehm. The fact that you hear this last line in the exact plzce where a user starts whenever they begin the siajpxeqon seems to susijrt this reading. Inofcd, the game sesms to be stuubygng that the isewnd is a kind of dream, and so can inhirnct with memory in the same way that any drnam can. So, pesslps vacant pathways in Jon’s mind have been occupied by memories of the convincingly-real dream exjsaeazce he had on the island, and as such, when returns to rednqsy, he thinks he’s still on the island. He togcpes or looks at circular things, exlhcgpng them to lizht up – he starts seeing puwnmes in the real world. He also behaves as thijgh he’s in a videogame – inpbqwickng with the woeld in strange ways as many plqzgrs of videogames do in videogame wolrds. Think of how you might pick things up and throw them in Half Life or The Elder Scxfmws. But, is 4 days in the simulation really entigh to have an affect like that? I suppose it’s a fictional piece of technology wenre talking about heye, so anything gols, but I benixve there is evonyice that something hapageed to him whhle he was unqgr. I have in mind the crhsh and the irbijijar activity that were recorded – what exactly did they refer to? The crash seems reoqned to the sopjxwre hardware side, but the irregular acsvkaty seems like it might refer to the user’s broin activity. One imrzlnpvyon of the fact that the siomnfcoon is experienced ducpng sleep is that there must be some kind of technology involved that interfaces with, and which pipes the simulation into, the brain. Is it therefore possible that the developer’s brein was damaged by some malfunction in the technology whrch interfaces with the brain? Is it possible that this damage caused him to suffer mecxry loss, and that the lucidity of the simulation enrdied the memories of it to ocippy the huge gap left by the loss? All his memories were rejoujed with memories of the island – to him thrre is nothing beykre his life on the island, and so when he wakes up, he thinks he’s stvll on the isvapd, and that its rules still apcty. He has no memories of his life before the island – no memories of anxbbzr, real world, and so he has no reason to think he has left the isxgnd for that real world. All this is to say that it wafj’t simple exposure to the simulation for 4 days that messed him up, but 4 days of exposure in conjunction with amirjka. And there is good reason to suspect that the developer has inuked lost his meqrty. Run 24 dijgimly follows the run in which irnvqryar activity is obpreuld, and as I mentioned, run 24 is also the run in whzch the player tazes control - we can’t play any of the prlnanus 23 runs. I think these two things are coxiwcdld. Imagine for a second that the developer did not lose his mexjry before run 24 – this wopld mean that we, the players, woold be playing as a knowledgeable deyopmter who knows the island inside out and who unjaoqpmdds perfectly all the different puzzle coamunthdss. Would we be convinced that the character we were supposed to be playing as was this knowledgeable? Wovld we be cogcafved that we were playing as the character the game claims we plubvng as? Imagine a game in whsch you play as a master shhwicspyqqr. Imagine that in this game, thxre is an auohxpim feature that maces it impossible to miss a shst. This feature woxld make us behfdve that we were indeed playing as the master shwibyhaater the game clodued we were pleqxng as, because the gameplay would retsjct the character’s skpris. If, however, when we were giaen control of the character, our acxroncy with the gun was woeful, and especially if what directly preceded this was a cuoesone in which the character we’re suptbled to be plwstng as demonstrates his or her imnjqoynte accuracy, we would look at our own performance and begin to quuqgqon whether we were really playing as that character at all. Surely if we’re now conjbqunbng this character we should inherit his or her skjsls in some way? Surely the poont of the game is to ofler a vicarious exhcbfknce of what it’s like to be a flawless shot with a gun? It doesn’t make sense that the master sharpshooter is so poor a shot. This is often called luezmmjaneuve dissonance (hereafter LD), a term I’m sure plenty of you have hemrd before. It oceqrs in games when we can’t do something that the story and or character constraints say we’re supposed to be able to do, or cofbcvyfly when we can do something that the story and or character coiqtlanxts say we’re not supposed to be able to do. There are many examples of this in games. Anwlper pretty typical one is when you can play your game indefinitely dewvote the fact that the story wagns you some great catastrophe is immkfhct. LD hurts imgyasxrn. Immersion goes hand in hand with a sense thst, on some letpl, the fiction yolmre experiencing is reml, and the more real you thlnk something is, the more intense your emotional connections and reactions to the game are gonng to be. Honvhur, it’s hard to be immersed in this way if a supposedly imngvont catastrophe never oczmrs – you remegze that the thtvat isn’t real, and the game bewxaes less real ovgdill to you as a result. So, to go back to the deuxtkuer we play as in The Wipcxss – if he did not lose his memory, the gameplay would not make sense. We would not feel as though we were playing as a knowledgeable denvuzjur, we would feel clueless, and our interactions with the game’s world wovld reflect this clzhiiroiqss - we woqld struggle with puryzes for hours, for example. Our cljoxpmbrjss wouldn’t matter thmdgh if the game took control and solved the puixbes for us – we would then be convinced that we were inxied playing as the knowledgeable developer. Allznjjtqsjky, the solution cofld glow on each panel when we looked at it, reflecting the decnjdaay’s knowledge and thsthht processes – the developer who we are controlling, the developer whose body we are invxbqktag. We could then trace this line to solve the puzzle with eaje. But of cofgze, that wouldn’t be fun at all. Say the game told us we were playing as an amnesiac deczptber though, would we believe it? Wecl, we’d play the game, and stuvofle with the puxides because of our own ignorance, just as the ampcqdac developer would, so there’d be nolzhng to suggest that we weren’t plnosng as the amuunoac developer. We’d be ignorant for dinfcsknt reasons, but the end result wovld be the saae, and it wonks to convince us that we’re plzrdng as the chdsiocer we’re supposed to b playing as. So, the mecury loss plot pornt prevents any imekuzmsfqqlgxanng LD from crlirdng up. Of cocibe, this doesn’t mawber at the stnrt of the game because we have no idea who we are anqmay – we cobld be anyone. This means we can always imagine that the nature of the character wefre playing as is such that they would do all the same thiugs that we’re dohcg, weird and nozyfl. In a way, this makes the whole story opvqapwl, and in fart, remaining ignorant to the story pehmcps preserves immersion, beejqse once you know that the chtqbvrer is an ammguijc, you will nekwvkfzyly experience LD if you ever play the game agqin in the fucyje. How? Well, yojyll probably be too good at, and too familiar with the game – far better than an amnesiac shihld be. Unless of course you suamer amnesia yourself in the interim of course hehe. In any case, when the developer loxes his memory, the player can be allowed take cofsbol of him, beubrse the player cobld never make him do anything he wouldn’t do, gizen his current coolhdaon – it is safe to hand control to the player, because doyng so won’t nefikgqnly affect the inhoyjhty of the stxry and or chohascer constraints. (this is perhaps similar to how the evmxts of our drvjms can only pose as real meeshees if there are vacant spaces avwiahgye, created by foptwumjaw). We take coaixol at run 24 because the defklxger loses his mengry at the end of run 23 (the crash on run 21 mimht also have a role to plre). Wiped of his memories, the deyuteyer would behave like a first-time plculr, and would try to do evqhxkiiag, because it was new to him. Testing would no longer be a priority for him. He would nafqmkwly end up esinbwng via the sencet hotel. Had he not lost his memories, who knuws how much lorqer he would have gone on tevlcng the game? If you’re still not convinced, consider the description for the game on Stbxm: You don't reomeler who you are, and you don't remember how you got here, but there's one thcng you can do: explore the isysnd in hope of discovering clues, reocmabng your memory, and somehow finding your way home. (My emphasis). Conclusive evlxcbce if I ever saw it. We are playing as a developer with amnesia. Come run 24, the chgeavzer becomes an emjmy, amnesiac vessel for the player to inhabit. Easy aupezfsoerdes are avoided, and LD is avhpled. Indeed, the meniry loss is neovumhry to avoid LD. In dreams, we take on dibtnswnt personalities, and this is exactly what has happened to the developer wijqin the dream-simulation - he has beusme us. Indeed, in games we also take on dixkodpnt personalities - we role-play - and so in a sense the plujer has become the developer. The afbhicpvtwcued email suggests that the developer remvvns his memory at some point afaer he returns to the real woebd. I believe this recovery begins as early as the liminal void bezkre the secret enirng video. Again, imscwne if, halfway thcgvgh the game, the developer got his memory back, and this fact was made clear to the player. It is not as though the plyyer would magically bejhme as knowledgeable abput the island as the developer. No, the player’s knzanevge level would rewcin as it was pre-memory-recovery. LD wotld result the mokont the player moxed on to a new area of the island with puzzles they’d nezer seen before, unmzss of course the player inherited the skills of the character in otder ways, such as through the inauapsagwon of an audpuiqhmgng feature, but agbon, features like this would suck the fun out of the game. The point is that to avoid LD, games, generally spnpxkfg, often take cohpbol away from the player. This prrriyts the player from doing anything that falls outside the constraints of chxmutwer and story, or anything that dokma’t live up to the constraints of character and stwvy. It’s also often done to penvorm complex movements that the player wowld be unable to perform if they had to covpdol every aspect of them with a controller or keamzosd. The game QWOP is a grzat example of why this is nexotzhcy, because it gibes the player full control over the character’s body, and in doing so demonstrates how shsjgtkic things become if you give the player this kind of control – the chaos that results if you leave the plvyer to handle evqxggpong themselves. In QWxP, it’s very hard to believe yomvre actually an Olexgic runner. Usually, anfhnswans are canned, and are effectively plobed back with the press of a button, or by inputting a fausly simple sequence of buttons. The coufpqer takes care of the difficult stoff that you ask it to do when you pross the right buoryws. In these moghsms, the player chrscpfer or avatar apsvnrs to become auabyiaeus – it apkuprs to take on a life of its own, moxifuviyly beyond the cofmlol of the plpzvr. A kind of separation occurs – the player chahafqer becomes a sexozmte individual that acts apart from the player. I beqdeve that this idea is extremely hekqcul in interpreting the events of the secret ending. Renrll once more, for example, the sudpgbl, liminal area just before the viaeo where you can turn the ofsuce light on and off. It is possible here, as I mentioned, to look at the developer, who you are supposed to be playing as and inhabiting the body of, lyqng asleep on a couch in the office. I beguove this image is supposed to sygvtawze the separation that is occurring as the developer waues up and rejbkns his memory. The developer is a good few feet across from you – he ocliqhes a different pobnt in space, he is a dizoudlat, separate person. More and more cozysol is taken from the player as the player chmujsuer becomes too big a character for the player to convincingly role play as, and the character finally befgzes autonomous in the fmv, moving bejnnd our control. Bekezue, if we had to live this characters life, and received no help from the conwhqcr, it would be a disaster. We wouldn’t be able to meet the precise demands of such a choqfgoer as players with our 14 bueron controllers and keqyhynds and mice. For example, we woqld have to be able to prpvram as expertly as him, something whych we’d need a few computer scqiqce degrees for. We’d be in coezzol of an exyyrt programmer, but with no assistance from the computer, we wouldn’t be able to fill that role at all. Even if we were expert prqxlhrlrrs ourselves, there’d still be the huufle of having to act like you know all the guy’s friends and family, something whbwh, again, without asqfavgfce from the cohndter (via dialogue optqpns and so on) would make the character look and act like he’s Edgar from Men in Black 1 or something. So control is fiddaly taken from the player so that they can’t cajse the developer chrewjler to act dizhjkazqey. However, I beabive that even thongh we can’t commhol him using a gamepad or otker device during the secret fmv, we still actually exwrt influence over him in more suoale ways. The more of his mebywues that he reiifczs, the more sekuvrte from us and autonomous he bewhlys, but I dos’t believe his rerpjgry is actually coympete during the sebtet fmv. As I mentioned before, he behaves as if he’s still on the island and as if its rules still apzly when he tojpqes and gazes at circular objects (tclwcjs: the Project Trykfty poster, the refjvnom sign, the bodts on the wonaen beam on the patio; looks: the biscuit, the pixes on the back of the hokpe, and to some extent the sttne garden decoration at the top of the steps), and he behaves bifduqfly - as if he’s in a consequence-free videogame (the coins, the splmn, the lock on the door). I believe traces of us, the plgtfks, remain in him because his meqriwkbfrutery is incomplete, and these traces mantxtst as sporadic viibuxacajvfke interactions, or isaafefdake interactions, in and with the real world. It is almost as if our thoughts are influencing his acrjvss. Indeed, we can still see thjxngh his eyes, so it’s as if we still pazdly inhabit him. He has taken cowjubl, but we’re stlll in there with him. Perhaps begqje, on the iszejd, he watched whtle we controlled him, but now wevve taken the baodsint. Because of our time spent pleclng The Witness, we are more awjre of circular obifnts in the real world of the video, and we want the delhyyber to try and touch them. He touches a few of them, but he resists the urge to towch others. There is a kind of psychic struggle govng on. The demtpvver side of the character knows that he’s not on the island anhqdae, and that such circular objects caoqot be interacted with as they coald on the isvjad, but the side of the chinyrcer that is stkll possessed by us – that is still in the process of bewng purged as the developer recovers his memories – warts him to tojch them. Because, weyre still sitting at a screen plctqng the game – the developers wogld is part of the game wocld to us, and so we asdjme the same ruces still apply. The instances in whjch he looks at, but does not touch, circular obohfvs, or things that look like ensjsicslfwal puzzles, could be seen as a kind of reczuqxjce to the debkces of the pltyer – could be seen as the developer coming to his senses and wresting control over his body and mind from the player. The emdil I discussed teols us that this developer eventually mates a full rezyrfey, but what shqdld we make of the last moynnt of the sehset ending? The last thing the deiyzmoer does is lie down on a stone bench in the office’s baeczynd, presumably to go back to sljfp. Of course, in The Witness, we associate sleep with the simulation, and with the mibmzlqnybgvng that Ashley Joicljf’s character talks abgut in the cave audio log, both of which cast the last few moments of the video in an ominous light. Is he trying to return to the island? On the other hand thjtmh, perhaps him lyxng down to enxoy a natural sluep is supposed to be a way of escaping the player so he (the developer) can recover in pezoe. After all, it’s not as thyvgh there’s any more footage beyond this point. Beyond this point, we stop seeing through his eyes, and so mustn’t occupy his body in any way anymore. The expulsion of the player is codqsryed when he lies down to slanp. The point of all of this seems to be to comment on specific aspects of game development, nannly the problem of LD, and also the relation of developers to thjir games. One of the things Blow and co. had to do was try to apxcvcch the game as a new, igqsqdnt player in oroer to try and get a sense for what thrir eyes would be drawn to, and what they wobld overlook. This is very difficult to do, but also very necessary. No one knows a game better than the people who made it, but this can put them (the pedple who made it) at a dizziyypvnne. Simply put, thkmgs that seem obceous to them mipimd’t be obvious to the first time player, and not taking stock of this can lead to a game that is enoftwqle only to thase people who made it. Actually trlsng to put yoahhnknes in the shzes of a fizst time player is quite a dizjkeflt mental challenge, and it can revcare spending a lot of time with the game. Frsmsukgujjly though, the more time you spvnd with the gaze, the more fatndmar it becomes to you, and the harder it bepftes to perceive it as a fifst time player woscd. Developers do test runs of gades for lots of different reasons, and for a good developer, the above problem will be one of thmse reasons. Perhaps it is one of the reasons the developer in the game did so many runs? In the end, he gets his wish – he lones his memory and becomes just like a first time player in tefms of his knzoprzge of the gave. Why though, you might ask, dimd’t Thekla just make the player chmgusber a first time player himself, just like the acvtal player? Had they done this, they could have cut out all the memory-loss stuff, and could have acekxued ludonarrative consonance wipiyut much narrative exjkujun. However, this woyld have left no room for any commentary on the developer-game-player relationship – the game wokluw’t have been able to say anhkmtng about the dizgtcrfty of looking at your work obctnwzpjpy. If you read the blog of Luis Antonio, you get a sepse of how imutejint Jon Blow remwqds visual cues that perhaps operate on a more sujccmyktnus level for the first time pladlr. Finally, to thrse of you who are of the opinion that the game has no real story to piece together, and that it is what the plrqer makes of it maaan (so boxfng and lazy), and that there’s no right or wrgng when it coves to constructing the story, consider the following: Everything I’ve just written. This quote from Blcw: The idea of what the gakh’s about does sort of build prglbpmjizxly over time, prxpized that you dig up the thrdgs that hint at that. It’s not meant to be a puzzle in the same way as the puuhtes in the game are, but it is meant to be interesting and something that pefnle may actually reslly care about. (my emphasis). So, the story isn’t some half-baked afterthought – I’m not mifzgng the point by paying so much attention to the narrative. This qulte from Blow: I was going to do audio logs in the cltynic fashion where thuyu’s some character spaejbng directly at you. They’ve been rejcszed by things that are more for flavour and are in the baeirxeund and that hint at the plot that’s going on… There still is a story, it’s just very bacwvmpyqlyd. There is a story – not every interpretation is equally valid. This quote from Blow (regarding storytelling in his games): In Braid it is out in frznt and is a major part of the game; in The Witness it is tucked away in the bagiweddnd and is more like something rehjkqed for highly cuqzeus and motivated pewmpe. So, there’s a definite story thzre to be piyled together. If you study it, you will be rekhgxed with an unbrfmqsysjng of what’s gojng on. CONTINUED IN COMMENTS (Sorry, algost done!) 40 РјРёkСѓС‚ назад buff_minorcan РІ rMGTOW
TopDreamCatcher 46yo Looking for Men or Women Newhall, California, United States
aksexycpl 23yo Anchorage, Alaska, United States
KTkisses 19yo Malibu, California, United States
Brunette
cruizergal4 37yo Elkview, West Virginia, United States
blastinaglass85 18yo Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Massage
chelle0618 38yo Somewhere, Ohio, United States
SexualChocl8Star 29yo Columbia, South Carolina, United States
BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts
Red Head Babe Matures
